based research has increased substantially over the last    15 years. There has also been a diversification of the sources of funding for    research institutions that now include national governments,   supranational   bodies      (e.g.,  the   European Commission), regional    governments, business enterprises and civil society. The respective weight of    teaching and research and the mechanisms through which research activities    can be financed and encouraged vary considerably among countries and    universities. In general, universities in Europe    currently face similar challenges: offering courses to young adults, meeting    the demand for ongoing education and training, and participating in knowledge    production in increasingly diverse contexts and with an ever-greater variety    of partners. The juxtaposition of these different tasks generates strong    tension within universities, in part due to limited resources. The situation    is exacerbated by the fact that the main missions of universities are often    ambiguous; additionally, key stakeholders and managers may not agree on    priorities. (Akrich and Miller, 2007).  
           There are    about 4200 universities and colleges in the U.S., and most of the research is    carried out at about 263 doctoral/research universities. Universities perform    about 13% of total R&D, and 82% of federal support goes to 100    universities. Twenty of them receive about 34% of the government support    (Eliasson, 2004).  
           In 2004, Russia had    1071 higher education establishments (40% more than in 1993). They are    starting to be involved in research (OST, 2006a). 
        5.3.2.4 Multinational enterprises and small and medium    enterprises: trends 
      Today's multinational corporations  (MNCs)     see innovation as a strategic element in economic competition. The    life cycles of products are increasingly short, and firms are encouraged to    produce returns on investments more and more quickly. Consequently, an    R&D race has developed among multinationals. R&D activities enable firms    to build up knowledge about technologies to support their key activities.    R&D is also critical to the firm's long-term competitiveness, by    enabling them to identify, acquire and apply knowledge that has been    developed by others.  
             MNCs have been    expanding R&D outside their home countries in recent decades. R&D    investments by MNCs, within their affiliates or with external partners in    joint ventures and alliances, support the development of new products,    services and technological capabilities. These investments also serve as    channels of knowledge spillovers and technology transfer that can contribute    to economic growth and enhance competitiveness abroad. International R&D    links are particularly strong between USA and European companies,    especially in pharmaceutical, computer and transportation equipment    manufacturing. More recently, certain developing and newly industrialized    economies are emerging as hosts of US-owned R&D, e.g., China, Israel    and Singapore    (NSF, Science and Engineering Indicators, 2006).  
             Small and    Medium Enterprises (SMEs) are extremely heterogeneous, ranging from high-tech    start-ups to small building contractors to the local companies. However the    sectoral coverage narrows considerably when the focus is on research related    issues. Technology based SMEs account  | 
       | 
    for around 10% of all SMEs (NSF, Science and Engineering    Indicators, 2006). 
        5.3.2.5 International, national and regional governments:    trends 
      A variety of actors, including advisory bodies, national    agencies, ministries and specialized institutes are involved in making and    implementing national science, technology and innovation policies. These    actors engage in a wide range of activities, including planning, forecasting,    strategic intelligence and consultation with stakeholders. The national    level actors are involved throughout the process, which covers needs    identification, agenda-setting, policy implementation, policy evaluation and    benchmarking results. The forms of intervention of regional powers in    research and technology policies vary.  
             The defining    characteristics  of the US public    R&D policy are an even stronger impact of the economic factors than in    other geographical areas, the enormous influence of defense-related research    activities, and the importance given to the high potential areas made up of    converging technologies (EU Commission, 2006). North American policies emphasize    research support for regional and local universities. Regional authorities    have policies for attracting and developing a qualified local workforce;    these policies spurred the creation of technology clusters and parks. In the USA, 60% of all R&D is concentrated in six    states, with California    alone accounting for 20% (UNESCO, 2006b).  
             In Europe, national authorities generally retain the leading    role in policy formulation and implementation, but there are very wide    differences among countries in the extent and nature of this leadership    (Akrich and Miller, 2007). Europe is much more influenced by societal, i.e.,    social and environmental, factors than the U.S. as far as R&D policy    setting is concerned. Ecological and quality of life issues generally provide    a unifying and defining element of European public R&D support policy.    Nevertheless, the European landscape is characterized by important    inter-country differences. A number of factors account for this, such as GDP,    political environment and scientific position. Europe    is also faced with policy rigidities that strongly affect the efficiency of    public support, influencing both the form in which support is being    administered and the research organization itself (EU Commission, 2006). The    distribution of prerogatives between regional, national and European    government varies from country to country, e.g., the länders are very influential    in Germany, and    regionalization is being introduced in Spain    and the United Kingdom. 
      5.3.2.6 Uncertainties of the future 
        There are a number of uncertainties related to the future    and the way these questions will be answered in the different regions of NAE    will affect the AKST systems. These questions are:  
        •     The capacity    of universities and public research organizations, the private sector and    the government to jointly define research priorities and fund R&D in order    to make their country's economies competitive is uncertain.  Collaborative research is gaining ground,    and measures could be taken to further promote it and  |