| 
     from the United States and more recently by the increased
      use of maize to produce ethanol in the United States. 
           LAC is one of the most important regions in the world
      in livestock production. Nonetheless, beef exports are dominated
      by just two countries, Argentina and Brazil. Of total
      world beef exports, estimated at 5.72 million tonnes (USDA,
      2005), Argentina and Brazil together account for 37%, with
      2.14 million tonnes of beef exported between them. It is
      forecast that the economic take-off of Asia, mainly China
      and South Korea, will result in a 22% increase in demand
      for beef with respect to 2005 imports (USDA, 2005). As
      for hog production, of a total of 4.2 million tonnes sold in
      the international market, only 11% is produced by LAC.
      Once again, two countries alone account for the lion’s share
      of these figures: Argentina (48 million tonnes) and Mexico
      (440 million tonnes). 
           Milk production in LAC is far below expectations, taking
      into account the proportion of arable land and pastureland
      in the region. The region produces only 8.96% of the
      milk produced in the world (FAPRI, 2006). The production
      of milk is concentrated in South America (Argentina, Brazil,
      Peru, Venezuela and Colombia). In terms of exports, the region’s
      performs at levels below what one would expect given
      the world dynamic in relation to processed products. Only
      Argentina and Uruguay export butter, cheese and powdered
      milk. 
           The wealth of LAC’s marine biomass has not been properly
      taken into account, as evidenced by the low levels of
      production of this resource. The fish supply internationally
      is 100.2 million tonnes, only 3.1 million tonnes of which is
      produced in Latin America and the Caribbean (this figure
      does not include Mexico). 
           The area in forests and timber production constitute another
      category with extraordinary potential. The region is
      one of the more forested in the world, with one-fourth of the
      total forests worldwide (UNEP, 2002b). The forested area
      comes to 834 million ha of tropical forest and some 130 million
      ha of other types of forest, accounting for 48% of the
      total. This forest cover is not evenly distributed, for Argentina,
      Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Mexico, Peru and Venezuela
      account for 56% of the total. There are other countries,
      however, with serious forest problems, such as Haiti, less
      than 3% of whose territory has forest cover. The forests of
      LAC contain 160 billion m3 of timber, accounting for onethird
      of all timber in the world. In terms of exports, Brazil
      and Chile are the leading exporters of timber and timber
      products. It should be emphasized that any type of use of
      forest resources should take into consideration the possible
      environmental impacts and impacts on climate change and
      be done in the context of sustainable management plans. Today
      there are three programs for tropical timber certification
      that attest to the origin of the timber and whether it comes
      from a forest managed using certain criteria of environmental
      sustainability (Baharuddin, 1995). Forest resources may
      also be tapped by rural communities and provide an important
      source of income to the communities that live in forest
      areas. Mexico is one of the world leaders in community
      forest management for commercial timber production (Bray
      et al., 2005). The Mexican communities are attaining a balance
      between income-generation for the community and
      forest conservation. 
     | 
      | 
    
           In summary, among the main trends in the region in
      recent years, special mention can be made of the production
      of oil-bearing crops, particularly soybean, which increased
      considerably in Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia and Paraguay, as
      well as African palm in Honduras, Guatemala, Costa Rica,
      Ecuador and Colombia. In addition, there was an increase
      in the cultivation of fruits and vegetables for export, mainly
      in Mexico, Chile, Argentina, Brazil and Costa Rica. Another
      trend during the 1990s was the increase in forest products in
      Chile, Argentina, Uruguay and Honduras and the increase
      in cattle-ranching in Brazil, Mexico and Chile. In the English-
      speaking Caribbean there has been a transformation of
      agricultural lands to urban development and tourism, increasing
      dependence on imported foods. In many countries
      of the region, the increase in exports has occurred at the
      expense of food production for the domestic market, which
      has led to an increase in imports of agricultural goods (including
      fish and forest products, as well as agroindustrial
      products). 
           According to an extensive study by CEPAL cited by David
      et al. (2001), from 1979 to 2001, the region imported
      two times more agricultural products than it exported.
      Nonetheless, FAO data show that the deficit in the exports
      of grains and legumes is much greater for the countries of
      Mesoamerica and the Caribbean than for South America,
      although the data for South America are highly influenced
      by the exports of countries such as Brazil and Argentina
      (see Figure 1-9). This emphasis on export products also has
      repercussions on the food sovereignty of the countries of
      the region. For example, among the products with a market
      deficit are products essential for food in the region, such
      as maize, beans, rice, cereal grains, milk and other dairy
      products (David et al., 2001). Finally, these trends have also
      affected the agrarian structure of several countries in the
      region, since the increase in exports has taken place mainly
      in the most capitalized sector of agriculture (the large-scale
      producers tied to agroindustry and the export market) and
      have resulted in the displacement of small-scale producers.
      The CEPAL study concludes that the neoliberal reforms responsible
      for the changes described have accentuated the
      differences between those who have access to capital and
      market and those who do not (David et al., 2001).       
       
    Transgenic crops. Despite the controversy concerning around
      transgenic crops, gradually they have been adopted in LAC,
      with impacts perceived by some as negative and by others
      as positive, in relation to the goals of sustainability, poverty
      reduction and equity. The Southern Cone is the region
      with the largest production of transgenic crops, with almost
      32 million ha planted in 2006 (Argentina, 18; Brazil, 11.5;
      Paraguay, 2; Uruguay, 0.4). Mexico, Colombia, Honduras
      and more recently Bolivia are also producing transgenic
      crops, but have less than 0.1 million ha each (James, 2006).
      Today, LAC produces just over one-third of the transgenic
      crops in the world. Most are accounted for by just three
      crops: herbicide-resistant soybean (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay,
      Uruguay, Bolivia and Mexico), Bt maize (Argentina,
      Uruguay and Honduras) and Bt cotton (Argentina, Brazil,
      Mexico and Colombia) (Table 1-9) (James, 2006).       
         Transgenic crops have been an economic success story
    in some countries of Latin America, in particular Argentina;  |