cannot only be translated into value added but also into
easy and preferential access to generic technologies. The
challenge is to elaborate legal frameworks and to develop
appropriate institutions for the commercial exploitation of
biodiversity products. There are significant opportunities in
this sector, since the international markets for biodiversity
products and services are fast expanding. Many developing
countries could benefit from the expansion of the market for
biodiversity products and services and exploit the potential
value of biodiversity. This is only true if biodiversity is protected,
since it can easily become a non-renewable resource
if there are threats, extinctions and vulnerabilities.
Another option is the development of technologies
incorporating local knowledge for the conservation and
sustainable use of biodiversity (combining traditional and
agroecological know-how). The region has great potential
based on its natural riches, especially in its biodiversity.
Many plant and animal species are native to the region and
can form the basis of poverty reduction strategies. Biotechnology
and other niches offer opportunities for improving
agricultural productivity without increasing the use of agricultural
inputs. A key element of this strategy is to ensure
the participation of producers and the identification and
pursuit of opportunities throughout the food chain.
In order to succeed in the options described above
there must be an inventory and study of local and regional
biodiversity (conservation and sustainable use and related
know-how). The study on biodiversity must be carried out
in close association with the taxonomy, evolution, biogeography
and ecology, but on its own terms from which it is
hoped that new paradigms will emerge (IAVH, 2006). The
most notable lines of work are related to the role of biodiversity
in organisms, the structure and functioning of ecosystems,
their value to and use by man, and their inventory
and monitoring. It is important that the value enhancement,
monitoring and inventory of biodiversity, including the way
in which inventories are carried out, are all done under common
research guidelines that ensure that the compilation of
data is standardized. The aim is to arrive at estimates that
allow for comparisons of critical sites for protection, identification
of key and indicative species, improvement of the
procedures used in the exploitation of resources, and evaluation
of production systems that have higher yields and less
impact on biodiversity.
4.2.4.2 Sustainability of livestock farming
It is necessary to identify and disseminate options for sustainable
and productive livestock farming in Latin America
and the Caribbean, such as forestry and pasture land
systems, protein banks that use various plant species as a
source of energy and of protein for cattle (in other words,
use of diverse landscape elements, such as tree barriers,
significant shrub and tree biomass), protection of basins,
and recycling of excreta in order to mitigate harmful or
catrostrophic effects on soils and water. Depending on the
type of biomass or ecosystem (since in Latin America there
are savannahs, gallery forests, wetlands, foothills, the Brazilian “cerrado” and even the Andean high plateau which,
with global warming, are now being used for cattle farming),
the AKST should carry out research into and implement
ecological principles to maximize sustainability and
|
|
production. Know-how (local but also the imported variety)
and technologies are needed to stabilize agriculture and preserve
natural assets.
Environmental management in areas where livestock
farming is practised leads to the unregulated occupation of
land that is restored as a result of the creation of conservation
units in regions of low agricultural potential, which
could make the land resource more expensive and stimulate
investment to increase productivity in areas already open or
degraded in hopes of improving the environmental management
of private land (Arima et al., 2005). In sum, when
land used for livestock farming is degraded, the inhabitants
leave and the land remains degraded. The aim is therefore to
reverse the trend so that the land becomes sustainable and
the population remains.
On the other hand, it is also necessary to develop criteria
for the allocation of financial resources in accordance
with the rate of compliance with environmental regulations
(Arima et al., 2005) (policy in support of AKST systems).
The creation of options in the livestock sector requires
technical solutions to increase efficiency in terms of head
of cattle per hectare and improve the quality of livestock
without degrading the soils, water or biodiversity. This option
may limit the expansion of cattle farming in wooded
areas (FLOAGRI, 2005), but the harmful effects of intensive
livestock farming models will not be mitigated if decisive
and comprehensive acion is not taken to achieve the goals
of IAASTD.
4.3 Options for Strengthening AKST
Capacities
AKST capacities can be strengthened by creating new institutional
mechanisms, promoting participatory research,
and strengthening existing institutions, provided that they
revise their teaching curricula. Special emphasis should be
placed on the issues of property rights and gender equality.
4.3.1 Creation of institutional mechanisms for
knowledge sharing
The synthesis of know-how and its sharing/dissemination
within the three models identified (Figure 4-1: conventional,
traditional and agroecological) require the use of new institutional
tools that are appropriate to each context. Projects
designed to promote knowledge sharing have proven to be
effective in many cases. This sharing has led to significant
technological improvements with positive effects on the
well-being of the participants and to improvements in the
environment. However, in some cases the same initiatives
can promote the spread of inappropriate and even dangerous
technologies and management practices (for example,
use of the pesticide Chlordecone, which is banned in Europe
but still used in some Caribbean islands (see http://www.minefi.gouv.fr/dgccrf/03publications/avtualitesccrf/
/chlordecone).
Thus far there is no legal or institutional tool to regulate
such practices.
A great variety of groups have engaged in knowledge
sharing initiatives, but their different and uncoordinated
forms of organization and their excessive dependence on a
few people acting as leaders are a source of weakness and
prevent their spread. There is also the problem of the lack
of continuity of these initiatives. In order to redress this
|