Previous | Return to table of contents | Search Reports | Next |
« Back to weltagrarbericht.de |
Agricultural Knowledge and Technology in Latin America and the Caribbean: Plausible Scenarios for Sustainable Development | 163
3.5.5 TechnoGarden Agricultural diversification is already beginning in the megadiverse LAC countries (Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru and Venezuela. But not all of these countries initially have the capacity to conduct the research needed to obtain an adequate economic return from different environmental services. Brazil, Colombia, Mexico and Venezuela are in the best position to do so. Environmental protection, an understanding of ecosystems and the environmental services they provide, the correction of anthropogenic aggression against nature, interaction among the different socio-economic, cultural, and environmental systems, and the creation of differentiated products by technological innovation (always with a low environmental impact), and new processes for diversification of agriculture constitute the main items on the technological agenda in this scenario. This is a scenario that gives preference to the growing integration of knowledge of all kinds, whether formal or traditional. Thus, more than in any other scenario, this world is governed by knowledge, which at the same time strongly drives it, leading to the development of a new understanding of the systems and their integration. It is also a world in which all social groups are covered by R&D, while at the same time the development of new products and processes intensifies, as does the anticipation of problems, especially in relation to the environment. Consequently, a large capacity for management and planning |
of the development of know-how and technologies is also needed. Here the scenario differs from Adapting Mosaic, where the issue of the speed of technological development is not as important. 3.5.5.2 Implications for sustainable development policies This means that new institutions and institutional arrangements need to be created to support this new paradigm, but they are also required to monitor its benefits and risks for society. Countries that already have the capacity to generate technology and megadiverse countries, which are encountering environmental protection pressures and already have relevant laws, will find it easier to adapt to the new paradigm. Unemployment is one of the major problems in this scenario. It will have a greater impact on countries whose current population is characterized by low levels of education, such as Peru, Bolivia, Honduras, and the Dominican Republic. In these countries especially, policies that will lead to the creation of new job opportunities can be implemented, in areas such as diversification of agriculture, enterprises related to the new agriculture-based products, or reductions in workload. Despite the concern over the environment, new environmental
problems emerge, as a result of the technological
solutions tried out in this scenario. R&D needs to be
oriented to achieving a systemic, in-depth understanding of |
References
Anderson, K. y E. Valenzuela. 2006. Do global trade distortions still harm developing country farmers? Pol. Res. Working Pap. 3901. World Bank, Washington DC. Bora, B., A. Kuwahara, y S.Laird. 2002. Quantification of non-tariff measures. Policy issues in international trade and commodities. Study Ser. No. 18. UNCTAD, Geneva. Byerlee, D., y K. Fischer. 2000. Accessing modern science: Policy and institutional options for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries. 24th Conf. Intl. Agr. Econ. Assn. 14-18 Aug 2000. IAAE, Berlin. Carpenter, S.R.P., P.L. Pingali, E.M. Bennetty and M.B. Zurek (eds) 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Scenarios, Vol. 2. Island Press, Washington DC. Castro, A.M.G. de, S.M.V. Lima, J.S. Silva, A. Maestrey, J. Ramirez Gaston, J.S. Guerra et al. 2005. Proyecto quo vadis: El futuro |
de la investigación agrícola y la innovación institucional en América Latina y el Caribe. 1ª. ed. IFPRI, Red Nuevo Paradigma, Quito. Castro, A.M.G. de, S.M.V. Lima, M.A. Lopes, M. dos S. Machado, y M.A.G. Martins. 2006. O futuro do melhoramento genético vegetal no Brasil: Impactos da biotecnología e das leis de proteção de conhecimento. EMBRAPA, Brasilia. CEPAL. 2006. Panorama de la inserción internacional de América Latina y el Caribe. CEPAL, Santiago de Chile. CEPAL. 2005a. Panorama social de América Latina. Cepal, Santiago de Chile. CEPAL. 2005b. Objetivos de desarrollo del milenio: Una mirada desde América Latina y el Caribe. CEPAL, Santiago. De Ferranti, D., G. Perry, W. Foster, D. Lederman, y A. Valdés, 2005. Beyond the city: The rural contribution to development. World Bank, Washington DC. |
Dutfield, G. 2001. TRIPS-related aspects of traditional knowledge. Case Western R. J. Int. L. 33:233-275. Filgueira, C., y A. Peri. 2004. América Latina: los rostros de la pobreza y sus causas determinantes. Proy. Reg. Pobl. CELADE. CEPAL, Santiago de Chile. Fischer, G., M. Shah y H. van Velthuizen. 2005. Climate Change and Agricultural Vulnerability. IIASA, Vienna. Jaffee, S., K. van der Meer, S. Henson, C. de Haan, M. Sewadeh, L. Ignacio et al. 2005. Food-safety and agricultural health standards: Challenges and opportunities for developing countries export. World Bank, Washington DC. Jones, J.G.W. 1970. The use of models in agricultural and biological research. The Grassland Res. Inst., Hurley. Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, y M. Mastruzzi. 2006. Governance matters V: Aggregate and. |
Previous | Return to table of contents | Search Reports | Next |
« Back to weltagrarbericht.de |