corporating knowledge into production systems remain in
effect. The region tends to become standardized in its technological
efforts, and plentiful resources prevail throughout
most of the region. Problems of access to water are solved
by new technologies to reprocess wastewaters and by desalinization
of salt or brackish waters. Land as a resource
and environmental protection are ensured through the successful
use of degraded environments considered as hostile
to life in the past.
The major production systems, which use modern production
and management methods, operate with great efficiency
and produce high-quality products using advanced
processes; this enhances their capacity to compete on markets.
A large component of knowledge and technology are
incorporated into these products and processes, thereby
generating countless differentiated products.
Smaller-scale production systems (no longer called “small producers”) participate as suppliers of preprocessed
raw materials for large production chains. The vast majority
of the production systems are successful.
3.4.5.2.4 Results of interaction among the systems
If only agriculture-based productive activities are considered,
income inequality is sharply reduced in this period,
as a result of the insertion of many producers, considered
as small producers in the previous period, into powerful
production chains and transnationals. Thus all the social
groups participating in this activity obtain higher incomes.
However, wage-earners who were working in the fields before
the work was completely technified lose their jobs and
migrate to the cities, which are now faced with an increased
demand for food and basic services.
Access to education, housing, and food security are
guaranteed by governments in different ways. Employment,
however, is not guaranteed, although the diversification of
agriculture has contributed to its increase and governments
have implemented powerful mechanisms to create alternative
labor markets and provide compensation for the unemployed.
Urban food security is supported by abundant, cheap,
diversified food that meets high health standards. The sustainability
of agricultural production systems gradually increases
throughout the period, as a result of the application
of more sustainable technologies, but also because agriculture
has another paradigm, since environmental services are
almost always provided along with the conventional production
systems. Another important reason for this growing,
yet incomplete sustainability is the use of regulatory
procedures and standards in the technified countries of the
region. There are also isolated cases of newly emerging environmental
problems, resulting from technological solutions
to previously existing problems.
3.5 Implications of the Scenarios for
Innovation and Development Policies
The purpose of this chapter is to help answer the following
question, with specific reference to Latin America and the
Caribbean and alternatives for the future development of
the region:
“How can we reduce hunger and poverty, improve rural
|
|
rural
livelihoods, and facilitate equitable and environmentally,
socially, and economically sustainable development through
the generation, access to, and use of agricultural knowledge,
science, and technology?”
On the basis of these alternatives, it is possible to propose
nonprescriptive recommendations as to how science
and technology can best contribute to this development.
The five scenarios constructed to answer this question
show that knowledge, science, and technology can contribute
to the changes suggested in the question, but in different
ways, depending on each alternative scenario considered.
The scenarios also make it clear that this contribution
will be more likely and facilitated in situations in which
other political, economic, and social conditions are also
present. In each scenario, the direct influence of these conditions,
and the interaction among them, will guide the action
of formal AKST systems, and the use of traditional knowledge,
and hence determine their contribution to sustainable
development, as proposed in the question that generated
this critical evaluation (IAASTD).
According to the Global Orchestration scenario, society
has abundant resources, it is guided by market forces and
is highly interconnected, but is concerned only on a reactive
basis with the impact of human action on the environment.
Formal AKST systems are characterized by uncontrolled
generation of new products, which increasingly incorporate
more technology to meet ever more sophisticated demand.
Little if any use is made of traditional knowledge. As a result
of the high degree of technology incorporated into the
system, there are unemployment problems. Due to the careless
exploitation of natural resources, the impact of human
action intensifies, generally leading to highly negative consequences
for agriculture and human life.
In the Order from Strength scenario, society is fragmented,
and there is a pervasive distrust of the rich, and generally developed
countries on the part of the poor and generally undeveloped
countries; highly restrictive governance conditions
and largely inadequate policies prevail in LAC, and there is
a strong trend towards aggressive exploitation of the natural
resources of the poor countries by the richer countries. The
region even loses its capacity to generate technology independently,
and becomes increasingly dependent on other
regions. The incorporation of traditional knowledge in this
scenario is only peripheral and marginal. As a result, LAC
becomes a mere supplier of inputs for the rich countries.
There is an enormous social and economic crisis, and the
environment is subjected to unprecedented impacts.
The “Life as it is” scenario presents a world in which
countries are integrated, but not to a great extent. The
course of action is defined by the market, but not fully, and
a division among countries persists, but it is still possible to
conceive of change in the long run. There is both a proactive
and a reactive approach to interaction between man and
nature. In other words, it is a pluralistic world, in which
none of the variables considered dominates others in its influence
on the scenario. In these circumstances, the AKST
system also obtains relatively mediocre results in its efforts
to achieve any of the major sustainable development objectives
referred to in the initial question that the chapter
endeavors to answer, although the results are positive in the
|