| rates of    production and consumption of food from livestock (Steinfeld et al., 2006ab).    The dynamic Asian livestock sector is growing at a rate between 3.5 and 5%    annually—more rapidly than crops such as cereals, vegetables and pulses—    driven partly by increasing population, rising incomes and changes in    consumer lifestyles. Livestock production in Asia and the    Pacific grew rapidly from 1992-1994 to 2002-2004, with the most rapid growth    occurring in China, 93%; Viet Nam, 93%; and the Philippines,    79% (FAO, 2006b). For the region as a whole, all categories of livestock    products grew rapidly. The most rapid production growth was in poultry, 83%    and eggs, 78%. Rapid growth in poultry and egg production was widespread    throughout the region. Production of milk exhibited strong growth in East    Asia, 136%; Southeast Asia, 65%; South    Southwest Asia, 52%; and the industrial economies, 33%. Pork production grew    50% for the region, with strong growth in Southeast Asia, 55%; East Asia,    53%; and the Pacific     Islands, 44%. Although    most ESAP countries were technically capable of increasing production in    meat, milk and eggs, most faced shortages of key feed ingredients. As a    result, there was a large and burgeoning world trade in feed crops. On the    other hand, the drive by livestock growers to serve urban markets led to    intensive production, with problems of livestock waste, land management and    distribution of meat products. Awareness increased of the potential for    transmitting diseases from animals to humans, particularly with the bird    flu, or avian influenza, crisis. Diseases affecting animals and humans could    spread rapidly across the region, creating transboundary epidemics. Concerns    remained about the rising demand for livestock feed, increased need for    veterinary services and training, loss of genetic resources and need for    extension for profitable livestock opportunities for small-scale producers    (FAO, 2006b). More than half the small-scale farmers in Asia    rely on livestock as a major source of income and nutrition. However,    small-scale producers have mostly not been a part of the rapid rise in    intensive animal production (FAO, 2006b).
 In population, the figures from 1994 to    2004 for all the livestock and poultry species showed no definite trends.    Ruminant numbers seemed not to have increased, except goats, which increased    by almost 100 million over ten years. The number of buffalo declined by more    than 10 million in ten years. Pigs and poultry, nonruminants, increased, with    chickens increasing by almost 10 billion from 1994 to 2004. Growth in    production of poultry and pork resulted in a growing shift away from pasture    systems. As livestock production became more intensified, feed shifted from    locally available resources to commercial feed concentrates, particularly in    pig and poultry production (Steinfield et al., 2006b).
 1.2.1.5  Plant biodiversity ESAP encompasses parts of three of the    world's eight bio-geographic realms and includes the world's highest mountain  system, the     second largest rainforest complex and more than half the world's coral    reefs. The rainforests of Southeast Asia    contain more than 25,000 species of flowering plants, equivalent to about    10% of the flora of the world. The region as a whole encompasses two-thirds    of the world's flora. Almost all nations in the region, except Singa-
 |   | pore and    Brunei Darussalam, depend heavily on harvesting natural products directly. Flora and fauna of the region are    increasingly threatened, but only a few countries have designated more than    15% of their land as protected areas. The drive for increased agricultural    production has resulted in loss of genetic diversity. The area of land under    rice cultivation rose by only 25% between 1960 and 1970, although production    rose by 77% by replacing traditional varieties with higher-yielding,    semidwarf varieties. More than 100,000 varieties of rice were found in Asia early in the 20th century. In 2002 there were less    than a dozen modern rice varieties being planted on 70% of land being    cultivated for rice (Dano, 2002). In Indonesia, 1,500 varieties of    rice disappeared from 1975 to 1990 (see subchapter 2.4.1).
 The Indo-West Pacific is the key area    for shallow-water marine biodiversity. Coastal habitat loss and degradation,    combined with increased sediment, nutrient and pollutant discharge into    coastal areas, is a major cause of concern, particularly for the island    countries. The rates of loss of coral reef and mangrove habitat in this    region are among the highest in the world. Thailand alone lost about 0.2 million    ha of mangrove forest from 1961 to 1993. Conversion of mangrove forest to    shrimp aquaculture and the use of unsustainable fishing practices, such as    blast fishing, were widespread.     However, the effects  of such    unsustainable practices on regional biodiversity are difficult to quantify.
 Although terrestrial biodiversity loss    has been a major concern, actual losses still have to be quantified. As much    as 70% of major vegetation types in Indo-Malaya have been lost, with a    possible associated loss of up to 15% of terrestrial species. Dry forests    suffered 73 % loss and moist forests 69%, while wetlands, marsh and mangroves    were reduced by 55%. Overall habitat losses were most acute in the countries    of the Indian subcontinent, the People's Republic of China, Thailand    and Viet Nam    (ESCAP, 1995b).
 The underlying causes of biological    diversity loss in the region include international trade, particularly the    trade in timber, which results in habitat loss; population growth, leading to    accelerated rates of change in land use; poverty and demand for common access    resources, leading to their unsustainable consumption; introduction of    nonnative species, leading to destruction of predator and prey equilibrium;    and improper use of agrochemicals, leading to loss of aquatic species. Other    major reasons include loss of keystone species, extensive deforestation and    habitat loss, increased trafficking in animals and animal body parts,    widespread conversion of land to agriculture and construction of large-scale    dams.
 In response, national governments have    implemented conventions related to biodiversity and are taking measures to    protect biologically rich areas. Twenty-nine ESAP countries had ratified the    Convention on Biological Diversity by 1 May 1996. Several regional    conventions covering parts of ESAP dealt with specific aspects of biological    diversity; the most significant were the Convention on Conservation of Nature    in the South Pacific (Apia Convention), the ASEAN Agreement on the Conservation    of Nature and Natural Resources (ASEAN Agreement), and the Convention on the    Protection of the Natural Resources and the Environment of the South Pacific    (SPREP Convention).
 |