Table 2-2. Biomass energy use in sub-Saharan Africa (2003).
Country |
Combustible
renewables and
waste (% of total
energy) |
GDP per capita
(constant 2000 US$) |
South Africa |
11 |
3,181 |
Namibia |
15 |
3,181 |
Senegal |
53 |
445 |
|
|
|
Gabon |
59 |
3,867 |
Zimbabwe |
60 |
479 |
Congo, Rep. |
62 |
935 |
Angola |
66 |
740 |
Cote d’Ivoire |
66 |
573 |
Ghana |
67 |
296 |
Benin |
69 |
325 |
Togo |
71 |
243 |
Kenya |
78 |
418 |
Cameroon |
79 |
723 |
Nigeria |
79 |
387 |
Sudan |
81 |
423 |
Zambia |
81 |
327 |
Mozambique |
86 |
262 |
Ethiopia |
91 |
120 |
Tanzania |
92 |
300 |
Congo, Dem. Rep. |
94 |
85 |
Sub-Saharan
Africa |
57 |
528 |
Latin America
& Caribbean |
15 |
3,749 |
South Asia |
39 |
498 |
High income:
OECD |
3 |
28,055 |
Source: World Bank, 2006.
problems by increasing energy conversion efficiency, reducing
indoor air pollution and alleviating the strain on the
surrounding environment. Consequently, access to modern
energy services is generally viewed as a necessary, albeit in
no way sufficient requirement for economic and social development
and efforts are underway in many African countries
to gradually transition to more efficient fuels (World Bank,
2004). It should be noted that this transition is not a linear
process, but involves, depending on the local circumstances,
several steps, including wood, charcoal, LPG, kerosene and
eventually electricity. In most cases during this transition,
several different sources of energy are used simultaneously
for different end-uses within each household (IEA, 2002;
Karekezi et al., 2004).
Modern bioenergy, i.e., the efficient production of modern
energy services such as liquid biofuels, electricity and
heat from biomass, offers one of several options to |
|
ernize the supply of energy services. Generally, the costcompetitiveness
of bioenergy with respect to other sources
of energy is highly dependent on local circumstances, e.g.,
the availability and price of alternative energy sources, the
nature of energy distribution networks, the special distribution
of energy consumers, availability of sufficient biomass
feedstock, etc. While the generation of electricity through
biomass digesters or cogeneration plants is often associated
with net social benefits and there seems to be ample potential
in Africa, the benefits of producing liquid biofuels
for transportation are less clear and subject to fierce debate.
The economics as well as certain environmental and social
externalities are heatedly debated and no consensus has yet
developed in the scientific community (see Global Report,
Chapters 3, 4 and 6).
Several African countries have invested in modern
sources of bioenergy, most prominently in cogeneration facilities
to generate electricity and process heat and in the
production of biofuels. In total, it is estimated that such
modern bioenergy contributes about 4.7% of primary energy
in Africa today (Kartha et al., 2005).
Malawi has been at the forefront of fuel ethanol development
in Africa, being the only country outside of Brazil
to have consistently blended ethanol into gasoline for more
than 20 years (World Watch Institute, 2006). Similarly,
Mauritius has been able to successfully produce electricity
through cogeneration plants, predominantly from sugar
cane bagasse. Several other African countries, e.g., Ghana,
Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa, Mali, Nigeria, Zambia and
Benin currently have, or are planning to introduce, active
biofuels policies (Dufey, 2006; IEA, 2006; World Watch Institute,
2006).
2.6 Sociocultural Issues
The peoples of sub-Saharan Africa belong to several thousand
different ethnic groups. Each ethnic group has its own
language, tradition, history, way of life and religion. These
cultural differences and resource endowments affect agricultural
practices in the region.In particular they are reflected
in land use strategies. Different strategies requiring
different types of expertise will be needed, in the transfer of
technology to pastoral herders, for example, in contrast to
permanent field agriculturalists.
Women and men are assigned both distinct and complimentary
roles in agriculture. Time allocation studies have
been done which aimed at determining which household
members are tasked with specific farm tasks (Saito et al.,
1992).
A typical farm household in SSA is based on the clear
distinction between men’s and women’s roles, including
management of different types of production either individually
or together; individual responsibility for mobilizing
the factors of production through barter or monetary exchanges
for individual or joint use; defined patterns for the
exchange of goods and services among the household members;
and elaborate arrangements that determine who makes
decisions with regard to selling, consuming, processing and
storing agricultural products (Box 2-2). In Kenya women
reported that men were responsible for building the granary
while women were responsible for hand digging, harvesting
and transporting crops. Though tasks may be viewed as the |