mibia, South Africa, Nigeria, etc., are making huge catches
of fish while countries like the D.R. Congo do not and are
still relying on importation from Europe.
2.4.2 Aquatic ecosystems management and
biodiversity potential
Aquatic ecosystems are stocks of resources whose sustainable
extraction should alleviate poverty. Africa and Madagascar
are divided in 11 bioregions and 93 freshwater ecoregions
(Roberts, 1975; Hughes and Hughes, 1992; Stiassny,
1996; Shumway et al., 2002). An ecoregion is defined as a
large area of land or water containing a distinct assemblage
of natural communities and species, whose boundaries approximate
the original extent of natural communities before
major land use change (Dinerstein et al., 1995). These communities
share most of their species, dynamics and environmental
conditions and function together effectively as a conservation
unit, usually following the boundaries of drainage
basins and often serving as biogeographic barriers.
African ichthyofauna are rich in biodiversity and can
be divided among 9 provinces (excluding the Great Lakes):
Congolese (Zairian) province (690-700 species); Lower
Guinean province (340 species); Upper Guinean province
(over 200 species); Sudanian province (200-300 species);
East Coast province (about 100 species); Zambezian (150
species); Quanza province (110 species); Southern (Cape)
province (33 species); and Maghreb province (40 fish species)
(Stiassny, 1996).
Most inland water fisheries are fished for basic needs
by traditional and local communities, but fishing may not
increase family income because of poor yields. Constraints
include a lack of modern fishing vessels and insufficient
knowledge of fish diversity, systematics and ecology (Shumway
et al., 2002).
The Congo basin has very high endemism (about 80%),
but fisheries management has failed in combining extractive
uses of biodiversity with effective conservation policies.
Riverine communities in the Congo basin use toxic plant
extracts and some chemicals (such as pesticides) to catch
fish from water systems. Fire is also used, especially during
the dry season in the reproduction (frying) areas. These
practices, of course, destroy fish diversity without the selection
of individual sizes and species. Juveniles and fingerlings,
which are the biological capital for the sustainable use of
biodiversity, are the most vulnerable fish population groups.
Increased poverty leads to high pressure on fish and in many
cases the regeneration period is ignored. The decrease in fish
size is sometimes due to this high pressure on the resource. “Use and conservation of renewable natural resources are
widely (and wrongly) perceived as conflicting objectives.
Foregone extractive use, for conservation, is viewed as a sacrifice,
but the greater sacrifice (for future users) is to forego
conservation. Conservation is itself a form of nonextractive
use: insurance for continued production” (Pullin, 2004).
There exists a constant conflict between fish as food and
fish as biodiversity, which requires wise management and
sustainable conservation measures. The Congolese example
illustrates four major challenges facing traditional fisheries:
- The lack of appropriate fishing technologies that preserve
fish capital (or the prevalence of illegal techniques
and practices);
|
|
2. The lack of sustainable local fish markets (low overall
incomes from fishing activities);
3. Poor produce conservation technologies (poor quality produce and decreasing market value); and
4. Overfishing of some water bodies (reduction of stock regeneration).
The combination of these elements is threatening aquatic
biodiversity and the challenges facing capture fisheries and
aquaculture in SSA are enormous. First, policy options that
are available to address stock recovery may yield results in
the long term, but small-scale fishers who are generally poor
have immediate needs. Thus, fishers are usually reluctant
to participate in implementing or accepting policies, such
as seasonal closures (with short-term consequences), even
though in the long-term food availability may increase.
Knowledge of fish stocks and the dynamics of aquatic
ecosystems is important for designing sustainable fishery
management policies. SSA countries lack the relevant data
and as a result formulate ad hoc policies to address problems
of complex fishery systems. A typical example is the use of a
uniform mesh size regulation to curtail overexploitation of a
multispecies fishery that is characterized by seasonal upwellings,
which is also a transboundary resource.
The need to completely enforce fishing regulations that
affect both small-scale fishers and industrial fleets is crucial.
The limited budget of state institutions responsible
for enforcing regulations coupled with widespread corruption
among fishery officers and the fact that fishers consider
some regulations illegitimate paints a gloomy picture
for the industry. State institutions in Africa are generally
weak and unable to cope with the activities of industrialized
fleets (Fisheries Opportunities Assessment, 2006) (Box
2-1). Moreover the judicial systems in most countries are
reluctant to enforce fishery regulations, which are generally
considered of less importance.
There are a number of potential challenges that confront
aquaculture in SSA. These include the provision of
information, training and credit, the availability of fishmeal
and fish oil for cultivation and mitigating the likely environment
impact of semi-intensive aquaculture. Substituting
vegetable protein for fishmeal may result in a higher mortality
rate and low rate of growth of several aquatic species
(Delgado et al., 2003). Intensive aquaculture requires the
Box 2-1. African fisheries management
“African fisheries management is haracterized by institutions
that have been too weak to cope with the burdens
of controlling industrial fleets and powering small-scale
fishers. With few exceptions, they have been unable to
stand up to European fishing fleets and other powerful
fishing interests. They have largely failed to establish a
coherent system of regulations that limit entry, reduce capacity,
establish appropriate fisheries management reference
points, enforce gear regulations and spatial and time
restrictions, and redirect subsidies away from production.”
(Fisheries Opportunities Assessment, 2006)
|
|