Table 6-4. Agricultural research: Who pays and who delivers?
|
Who Pays? |
Government including parastatal organizations |
Nongovernmental, organizations |
Private, commercial |
Research Objectives |
|
Public good, e.g., food security, environmental protection |
Organizational Agenda, e.g., poverty alleviation, animal welfare |
Private good, e.g., profits, increased utility of consumers |
Who delivers? |
Government, including parastatal organizations |
Government funded research institutes |
Government research institutes conducting external research contract |
Government research institutes conducting external research contract |
Universities* |
Govt funded research programs in Universities |
University research under contract to NGOs |
University research under contracts to commercial companies |
Nongovernmental, organizations |
NGOs undertaking research on contract to Government |
NGOs funding and operating own research programs |
NGOs conducting research on contract to private companies |
Private, commercial |
Commercial research organizations on contract to Government |
Commercial research organizations on contract to NGOs |
Market driven, research for competitive advantage, conducted "in house" or contracted out |
*Universities also fund their own research programs, but this usually draws indirectly on external funding sources, such as trust funds.
among AKS components but also between AKS components and the more general scientific and higher education communities (life sciences and economic/social disciplines) as well as policy makers, stakeholders and the general public.
Funding for cooperation across AKS institutions has led to the emergence of new partnerships and networks providing cross institutional and cross-disciplinary synergy in some NAE countries. Open dialogue, joint planning and fair sharing of credit are key success features in the promotion of these partnerships. It is now vital to design mechanisms for scaling these partnerships up and outwards, not only nationally, but also across the NAE region, both in research and in human capital development.
It is noteworthy that a recently published OECD study on Human Capital Investment concluded that "human capital seems to offer rates of return comparable to those available for business capital" (OECD/CERI, 1998). Allied to this conclusion is the increasing acceptance by many OECD governments that investment in the development of a knowledge based society can be a powerful stimulant to promoting innovation and competitiveness. Many governments have increasingly been prepared to give extra public funding for innovative research (especially interdisciplinary ones) to promote competitiveness and for human capital development through higher education designed to achieve competitiveness and life-long learning/re-education to maintain competitiveness. The experiences over several decades of AKST institutions linking research, higher education and extension/development in an integrated manner offers a valuable model for AKS to play a central role in addressing the wider societal issues including food safety, the food chain, sustainability of natural resource use and rural development. New partnerships, networks and relationships will |
|
be required for this potential to be realized and AKS institutions could be encouraged to take action accordingly.
6.5.6 Funding mechanisms and enablers of AKST
The new paradigm of multifunctional sustainable agriculture calls for new, increased and more diverse funding and delivery mechanisms for agricultural R&D and human capital development. There is continuing need for public funding to serve the public interest, as well as new investments by private organizations responding to market needs and opportunities. Funding arrangements can promote cooperation among all stakeholders. Open dialogue, joint planning and fair sharing of rewards are key success features in the promotion of these partnerships. Depending on circumstances, the following will be required:
• Public investment in R&D to serve the public good, addressing strategic issues such as food security and safety, impacts of climate change, long-term environmental sustainability of the system, social viability, protection of biodiversity, achieving strategic balance between land use for food and bioenergy, as well as other non-market issues that do not attract private funding;
• Public investment in human capital development to achieve widespread understanding of the complexities of multifunctionality and to develop the knowledge and skill sets necessary for effective decision making by all stakeholders. These developments will encompass initial education, professional formation and lifelong learning for AKST personnel as well as for a much wider range of clients, including civil society and public policy makers as well as farmers and others (especially women) involved in rural livelihoods;
• Public investment to support the development of multi- |