Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change. Geneva.
IPCC. 2007. The physical science basis.
Summary for policymakers. Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change. Cambridge Press,
Cambridge.
Irvine, J., and B.R. Martin. 1984. Foresight in
science: Picking the winners. Pinter, London.
Irvine, J., and B.R. Martin. 1989. Research
foresight: Priority setting in science. Pinter,
London.
ISNAR. 2003. Trends in the organization
and financing of agricultural research
in developed countries. Implications for
developing countries. Res. Rep. 22. ISNAR,
The Hague.
Jackson, T. 2005. Motivating sustainable
consumption. A review of evidence on
consumer behaviour and behavioural
change. Sustainable Dev. Res. Network,
London.
Johansson, S. 2005. The Swedish
foodprint—An agroecological study of food
consumption. Department of Ecology and
Crop Production Science. Swedish Univ.
Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
Juma, C., K. Fang, D. Honca, J. Huete-Perez,
V. Konde, S.H. Lee, et al. 2001. Global
governance of technology: Meeting the
needs of developing countries. Int. J. Tech.
Manage. 22(7/8):629-55.
Juma, C., and L. Yee-Cheong. 2005.
Innovation: applying knowledge in
development. UN Millenium Project, Task
Force on Science, Technology, Innovation,
New York.
Kabat, P., W. van Vierssen, J.A. Veraart,
P. Vellinga, and J. Aerts. 2005. Climate
proofing the Netherlands. Commentary.
Nature 438:283-284.
Kahiluoto, H., P. Berg, A. Granstedt, H. Fischer,
and O. Thomsson (ed). 2006. Localisation
and recycling in Baltic rural food systems.
Interdisciplinary Synthesis. BERAS Nr. 7.
Centre Sustainable Agric. (CUL). Swedish
Univ. Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
Kandel, W., and A. Mishra. 2007. Immigration
reform and agriculture. Paper presented at
the USDA Agricultural Outlook Conf., Mar
2007. ERS, USDA, Washington, DC.
Kates R.W., W.C. Clark, R. Corell,
J.M. Hall, C.C. Jaeger, I. Lowe, et al. 2000.
Sustainability science. Science 292:641-642.
Keating, P., and A. Cambrosio. 2003.
Biomedical platforms. Realigning the
normal and the pathological in late
twentieth-century medicine. MIT Press,
Cambridge, MA.
Kemp-Benedict, E., C. Heaps, and P. Raskin.
2002. Global scenario group futures.
Tech. Notes. SEI PoleStar Series Rep. 9.
Stockholm Environ. Inst., Sweden.
Keyzer, M.A, M.D. Merbis, I.F. Pavel, and
C.F.A. van Wesenbeeck. 2005. Diet shifts
towards meat and the effects on cereal use:

Can we feed the animals in 2030?. Ecol.
Econ. 55(2):187-202.
Klein, J.T. 1996. Crossing boundaries: Knowledge,
disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Univ.
Virginia Press, Charlottesville.
Klijn, J.A., and L.A.E. Vullings (ed). 2005. The
EURuralis study: Technical document. Rep.
1196. Alterra, Wageningen.
Knoppers, B.M., and C. Scriver. 2004
Genomics, health and society. Emerging
Issues for Public Policy, Canada.
Konyar, K. 2001. Assessing the role of US
agriculture in reducing greenhouse gas
emissions and generating additional
environmental benefits. Ecol.l Econ.
38(1):85-103.
Kulhmann, S., P. Boekholt, L. Georghiou,
T. Lemola, K. Guy, and A. Rip. 1999.
Improving distributed intelligence in
complex innovation systems. Final report
of the Advanced Science and Technology
Planning Network (ASTP). Available at
http://publica.fraunhofer.de/starweb/servlet
.starweb?path=pub.web&search=N-55510.
Lamb, H.H. 1995. Climate history and the
modern world. 2nd ed. Routledge, London.
Leijten, J. 2006. Between flat and spiky world
forces. An exploration of the consequences
of demographic and social changes for
rural areas. Short Report to the SCAR
Expert Working Group/EU Commission.
Foresighting in the field of agricultural
research in Europe. EU, Brussels.
Lele, S., and R.B. Norgaard. 2005. Practicing
interdisciplinarity. BioScience 55:967-975.
Lemmen, D.S., and F.J. Warren (ed). 2004.
Climate change impacts and adaptation. A
Canadian perspective. Available at http://
www.adaptation.nrcan.gc.ca.
Leeuwis, C. 2004. Rethinking innovation and
agricultural extension. In H.A.J. Moll
et al. (ed), Agrarian institutions between
policies and local action: Experiences from
Zimbabwe. Weaver Press, Harare.
Lévy, P. 2000. Collective intelligence: Mankind's
emerging world in cyberspace. Perseus
Books Group, New York.
Leydesdorff, L., and H. Etzkowitz. 1998.
The triple helix as a model for innovation
studies. Sci. Public Policy 25(3):195-203.
Libeau-Dulos, M., and E. Rodriguez Cerzo (ed).
2004. prospective analysis of agricultural
systems. Inst. Prospective Tech. Studies,
Tech. Rep. EUR 21311 EN. EC, Brussels.
Liefert, W. 2002. Comparative (dis?)advantage
in Russian agriculture. Amer. J. Agric. Econ.
84(3):762-767.
Liefert, W., S. Osborne, O. Liefert, and
M. Trueblood. 2003. Can Russia be
competitive in agriculture? Eurochoices
2(3):18-23.
Lockeretz, W., and M.D. Anderson. 1993.
Agricultural research alternatives. Univ.
Nebraska Press. <B>[[CITY?]]<B>
Lynden, G.W., and J. Van. 2000. Soil
degradation in Central and Eastern Europe:
The assessment of the status of human-

induced soil degradation. FAO Rep.
2000/05. FAO and ISRIC, Rome.
MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment).
2005. Ecosystems and human well-being:
Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment).
2006. Ecosystems and human well-being:
Scenarios—Findings of the Scenarios Working
Group. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Malassis, L. 1997. Les trois âges de l'alimentaire.
(Without English Abstract). Cujas, Paris.
Marris, E. 2006. Drink the best and drive the
rest. Nature 444:670-672.
Martin, B.R. 1995. Foresight in science and
technology. Tech. Anal. Strateg. Manage.
7(2):139-168.
McCalla, A.F. 2000. Agriculture in the 21st
century. CIMMYT, Mexico.
McFetridge, D.G. 1994. The economics of
vertical integration. Can. J. Agric. Econ.
42(4):525-531.
Meadows, D.H., J. Randers, and D.L. Meadows.
2004. A synopsis. Limits to growth. The 30-
Year update. Earthscan, London.
Metzger, M.J., M.D.A. Rounsevell, L. Acosta-
Michlik, R. Leemans, and D. Schröter.
2006. The vulnerability of ecosystem
services to land use change. Agric. Ecosyst.
Environ. 114:69-85.
Miller, R.J., P. Sorokin, Y.F. Lachuga, S. Chernakov,
and A.D. Goecker. 2000. A comparison of
agricultural higher education in Russia and the
United States. J. Nat. Resour. Life Sci. Educ.
29:68-77.
Mindeli, L. 2002. Overview of S&T and
innovation policies in Russia. In Dialogue
on S&T between the European Union and
the Russian Federation. CSRS, Moscow.
Morris, C. 2006. Negotiating the boundary
between state-led and farmer approaches
to knowing nature: An analysis of UK agri-
environment schemes. Geoforum 37(1):
113-127.
Morris, S.H. 2007. EU biotech crop regulations
and environmental risk: a case of the
emperor's new clothes? Trends Biotech.
25(1):2-6.
NIC. 2004. Mapping the global future. Report
of the National Intelligence Council's 2020
Project. Available at http://www.dni.gov/nic/
NIC_2020_project.html.
NISTEP. 2005. Science and technology foresight
survey, Delphi Analysis. Sci. Tech. Foresight
Center, Ministry of Educ., Culture, Sports,
Sci. Tech. (MEXT): Report no. 97. Nat.
Inst. Sci. Tech. Policy, Tokyo.
Nordmann A., 2004. Converging technologies,
shaping the future of European societies.
Report of the High Level Expert Group
Foresighting the New Technology Wave.
EC, Brussels.
NSF. 2003. The science and engineering workforce.
Realizing America's potential. Report of the
National Science Board. NSB 03-69. Nat. Sci.
Foundation, Washington, DC.
NSF. 2006. Science and engineering indicators
2006. Nat. Sci. Foundation, Washington, DC.