Heard, M.S., C. Hawes, G.T. Champion, S.J.
Clark, L.G. Firbank, A.J. Haughton, et al.
2003a. Weeds in fields with contrasting
conventional and genetically modified
herbicide-tolerant crops. I. Effects on
abundance and diversity. Phil. Trans. R.
Soc. London B 358:1819-1832.
Heard, M.S., C. Hawes, et al. 2003b. Weeds
in fields with contrasting conventional and
genetically modified herbicide-tolerant
crops. II. Effects on individual species. Phil.
Trans. R. Soc. London B 358:1833-1846.
Heemskerk, M., K. Wilson, and M. Pavao-
Zuckerman. 2003. Conceptual models as
tools for communication across disciplines.
Conserv. Ecol. 7(3):8.
Helenius, J. 2006. Food systems research and
interdisciplinarity. Proc. Seminar Developing
Organics, Session on Interdisciplinary
Interaction in Research. (In Finnish).
Helsinki, 14 Feb 2006.
Huffman, W.E. 1996. Labor markets, human
capital, and the human agent's share of
production. p. 55-79. InJ.A. Antle and D.A.
Sumner (ed), The economics of agriculture:
Papers in honor of D. Gale Johnson. Vol. 2.
The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Huffman, W.E. 1998a. Modernizing agriculture:
A continuing process, Daedalus (fall issue)
Huffman, W.E. 1998b. Education and
agriculture. In G. Rausser and B. Gardner
(ed), Handbook of agricultural economics.
North Holland, Amsterdam.
Huffman, W.E. 2005. Developments in the
organization and finance of the public
agricultural research in the U. S. 1988-
1999. Dep. Econ. Working Pap. Ser. Iowa
State Univ., Ames.
Huffman, W.E., and R.E. Evenson. 1993.
Science for agriculture: A long term
perspective. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.
Huffman, W.E., and R.E. Evenson. 2001.
Structural and productivity change in
US agriculture, 1950-1982. Agric. Econ.
24(2):127-147.
Huffman, W.E., and R.E. Evenson. 2006.
Science for agriculture: A long-term
perspective. Blackwell, New York.
Huffman, W.E., and R.E. Just. 1994. Funding,
structure and management of public
agricultural research in U.S. Am. J. Agric.
Econ. 76:744-759.
Huffman, W.E., and R.E. Just. 1998. The
organization of agricultural research in
western developed countries. Staff Pap. 304.
Dep. Econ., Iowa State Univ., Ames.
Huffman, W.E., and R.E. Just. 1999. Benefits
and beneficiaries of alternative funding
mechanisms. Rev. Agric. Econ. 19:2-18.
Huffman, W.E., and R.E. Just. 2000. Setting
efficient incentives for agricultural research:
Lessons from principal-agent theory. Am. J.
Agr. Econ. 82:828-841.
Humphries, S., J. Gonzalez, J. Jimenez, and
F. Sierra. 2000. Searching for sustainable
land use practice in Honduras: Lessons

from a program of participatory research
with hillside farmers. Agric. Res. Extension
Network Pap. 104. July. ODI, London.
Hunger Project. 2005. The Hunger Project
website. Available at http://www.thp.org.
ICI. 1978. Jealott's Hill fifty years of
agricultural research 1928-1978. Imperial
Chemical Industries Plant Protection
Division.
IFAR. 2007. Programs and fellowships. Available
at http://www.ifar4dev.org/fellowships.
IFOAM, 2005. Principles of organic agriculture.
Available at http://www.ifoam.org/press/
press/P rinciples_Organic_Agriculture.html.
IFOAM, Bonn.
IOBC. 1999. Integrated production. Principles
and technical guidelines. 2nd edition.
E.F. Boller et al. (ed) IOBC/WPRS Bulletin
22(4).
Ingram, J., and C. Morris. 2007. The
knowledge challenge within the transition
towards sustainable soil management: An
analysis of agricultural advisors in England.
Land Use Policy 24(1):100-117
Ingram, C.K., and K.D. Rubenstein. 1999. The
changing agricultural research environment:
What does it mean for public-private
innovation? AgBioForum 2(1):24-32.
Institute Rural Sciences. 2007. Europe: The
development of organic farming between
1999 and 2006. Available at http://www
.organic.aber.ac.uk/statistics/europe05.shtml.
Statistics Inst. Rural Sci., Univ. Wales.
James, P.G. 1971. Agricultural policy in
wealthy countries. Angus and Robertson,
Sydney.
Jantsch, E. 1975. Design for evolution. George
Braziller, New York.
Johansson, S. 2005. The Swedish foodprint—An
agroecological study of food consumption.
PhD dissertation. Acta Univ. Agric. Sueciae
2005:56. SLU Service/Repro, Uppsala.
Jorgenson, D.W., and F.M. Gollop. 1992.
Productivity growth in US Agriculture: A
postwar perspective. Am. J. Agric. Econ.
74:745-750.
Just, R.E., and W.E. Huffman. 1992. Economic
principles and incentives: Structure,
management, and funding of agricultural
research in U.S. Am. J. Agric. Econ.
74:1101-1108.
Kahiluoto, H., P. Berg, A. Granstedt, H. Fischer,
and O. Thomsson (ed). 2006. Localisation
and recycling in Baltic rural food systems—
interdisciplinary synthesis. Baltic Ecol.
Recycl. Agric. Soc. (BERAS) No. 7. Centre
Sustain. Agric. (CUL), Swedish Univ. Agric.
Sci., Uppsala.
Klein, J.T. 1996. Crossing boundaries. knowledge,
disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Univ.
Press Virginia, Charlottesville.
Klein, J.T. 1990. Interdisciplinarity. History,
theory, and practice. Wayne State Univ.
Press, Detroit.
Klein, J.T. 2004. Prospects for transdisciplinarity.
Futures 36:512-526.

Klevorick, A.K., R.C. Levin, R.R. Nelson, and
S.G. Winter. 1995. On the sources and
significance of interindustry differences in
technological opportunities. Res. Policy
24:185-205.
Labarthe, P. 2006. Changing European farming
systems for a better future: New visions for
rural areas. p. 330-334. In Proc. 7th Eur.
IFSA Symp. New Visions for Rural Areas,
7-11 May 2006, Wageningen.
Lambert, D.M., P. Sullivan, R. Claassen, and
L. Foreman 2007. Profiles of US farm
households adopting conservation-compatible
practices. Land Use Policy 24:72-88.
Lappe, EM., and J. Collins. 1988. World
Hunger: 12 myths. Earthscan, London.
Laszlo, E., and A. Laszlo. 1997. The
contribution of the systems sciences to the
humanities. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 14:5-19.
Leeuwis, C., 2004. Rethinking innovation
and agricultural extension. In H.A.J. Moll
et al. (ed), Agrarian institutions between
policies and local action: Experiences from
Zimbabwe. Weaver Press, Harare.
Lele, S., and R.B. Norgaard. 2005. Practicing
interdisciplinarity. BioScience 55:967-975.
Lipton, M. 2005. The family farm in a
globalizing world: The role of crop science
in alleviating poverty. 2020 Disc. Pap. No.
40. IFPRI, Washington, DC.
Lockeretz, W., and M.D. Anderson. 1993.
Agricultural research alternatives. Univ.
Nebraska Press.
MA. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
Synthesis Report. Island Press, Washington,
DC.
MacDonald, D., J.R. Crabtree, G. Wiesinger,
T. Dax, N. Stamou, P. Fleury, et al. 2000.
Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas
of Europe: Environmental consequences
and policy response. J. Environ. Manage.
59:47-69.
Mäkelä, J. 2006. Possibilities of triangulation:
qualitative and quantitative interpretations
of local and organic food. Proc. Seminar
Developing Organics, Session on
Interdisciplinary Interaction in Research. (In
Finnish). Helsinki, 14 Feb 2006.
Mann, C. 1997. Reseeding the green revolution.
Science 277:1038-1043.
Mansilla, V.B., and H. Gardner. 2003. Assessing
interdisciplinary work at the frontier. An
empirical exploration of "symptoms of
quality". Rethinking interdisciplinarity.
Available at http://www.interdisciplines.org/
interdisciplinarity/papers/6/7. Interdisciplines.
Masefield, G.B. 1972. A history of the colonial
agricultural service. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Miettinen, R. 2002. National innovation
systems. Scientific concept or political
rhetoric. Edita, Helsinki.
Miller, R.J., P. Sorokin, Y.F. Lachuga, S. Chernakov,
and A.D. Goecker. 2000. A comparison of
agricultural higher education in Russia and the
United States. J. Nat. Resour. Life Sci. Educ.
29:68-77.