Previous | Return to table of contents | Search Reports | Next |
« Back to weltagrarbericht.de |
210 | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) Report
gence of information and communication technologies, which have made it possible to develop efficient and competitive rural financial networks that can achieve economies of scale and reduce the costs of producing and distributing financial products under market conditions. At the same time new, non-banking financial instruments have been developed: trust funds, investment funds, asset securitization, factoring, etc. Assuming that the necessary IT and regulatory infrastructure is in place, these policies could have a swift impact on agricultural productivity and living standards by expanding access to low-cost financial services. This is all the more likely because the use of ICTs can help resolve the problem of access to financial services for rural people: the Internet and cellular phones make it possible to overcome the drawbacks of geographic isolation and can bring rural people into the banking system. Such policies would also provide tools for training rural people and producers through distance education. The time that these policies will need to have an impact on development will be relatively short, if they are accompanied by other policies for training people in the use of ICTs, etc. Nevertheless, all of this will have to be accompanied by a policy of investing in ICT access for rural sectors, if these policies for access to financial services are to work. Finally, and no less importantly, it is clear that financial policies for improving conditions and capacities for rural people face the great challenge of promoting instruments |
and institutions for channeling remittances to support the development of regional and local financial services, in communities with heavy emigration rates. This should help to retain people in the countryside and boost employment through the development of family enterprises or small businesses. 5.6.3 Financial support programs for helping
communities make the transition to a sustainable
production system |
References
Agrawal, A. 1999. Cultural and spiritual values of biodiversity. p. 177-180. En D. Posey (ed) UNEP’s global biodiversity assessment volume. Cambridge Univ. Press, UK. Altieri, M. 1996. Enfoques agroecológicos para el desarrollo de sistemas de producción sostenibles en los Andes. CIED, Perú. Astier, M., y J. Hollands. 2005. Sustentabilidad y campesinado: Seis experiencias agroecológicas en Latinoamérica. ILEIA, GIRA, ICCO, México. Bañón, R. 2006. Democracia y nueva gestión pública. En La participación en las administraciones públicas ¿cooperación o enfrentamiento? Univ. Politécnica de Valencia, España. Baranyi, S., C.D. Deere, y M. Morales. 2004. Tierra y Desarrollo en América Latina. Perspectivas para la investigación sobre políticas. Available at www.idrc.ca/es/ev-67380-201- 1-DO_TOPIC.htm. North South Institute/ IDRC, Ottawa. Barrow, C. 1994. Advances in tropical agriculture in the 20th century and prospects for the 21st. TA 2000, Trinidad, 4-9 Sep1994. Battiste, M., y J. Youngblood Henderson. 2000. Introduction. In Protecting indigenous knowledge and heritage. A global challenge |
Purich’s Aboriginal Issues Series. Purich Publ., Saskatchewan. Berry, W. 1996. The unsettling of America: Culture and agriculture. Sierra Club Books, NY. Bifarello, M. 2002. From delegation to participation the third sector and the state in associative networks Fifth Conf. Int. Society for Third-Sector Research, Cape Town, 7-11 July 2002. Univ. Nacional de Rosario, Argentina. Caporal, R., y J. Costabeber. 2004. Agroecología e extensao rural. Contribuicoes para a promocao do desenvolvimento rural sustentable. MDA/SAF/DATER-IICA, Brasilia. Cartagena, R., M. Parra, A. Burguete, y A. López. 2005. Participación social y toma de decisiones en los consejos municipales de los Altos de Chiapas. Revista Gestión y Política Pública. Vol. XIV, No. 2. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo Económico de México CIDE, México. CGAP. 2003. Servicios financieros para sectores rurales. Reseña para agencias de cooperación No 15 Octubre. Available at www.cgap .org/direct. CGAP, Washington DC. Cisneros, F.H. 1992. El manejo integrado de plagas. Guía de Investigación CIP 7. CIP, Lima. |
Cohen, G. 1993. Equality of What? On welfare, goods and capabilities. In A. Sen y M. Nussbaum. The quality of life. Clarendon Press, Oxford. Colchester, M. 2001. A survey of indigenous land tenure. Land Tenure Service. FAO, Rome. Colomer, A. 2006. Las condiciones de ciudadano y participación en las administraciones públicas. En La participación en las administraciones públicas ¿cooperación o enfrentamiento? Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, España. CONAM. 2006. Perfil nacional sobre cambio climático en el Perú. Proyecto de Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para la Implementación de los Acuerdos Ambientales Globales, PNUD. Deere, C. 2005. The feminization of agriculture? Economic restructuring in rural Latin America. UNRISD Occasional Paper 1. February. Available at www.unrisd.org/ publications/opgp1. Delgado, F.A., y B.D. Ponce. 1999. Cosmovisión Andina para un Desarrollo Rural Sustentable. Investigación, Interacción Social y Educación Superior en Bolivia. Available at www .agruco.org/pub/artic/1999/68.htm. Deruyttere, A. 1997. Indigenous peoples and |
Previous | Return to table of contents | Search Reports | Next |
« Back to weltagrarbericht.de |