Previous | Return to table of contents | Search Reports | Next |
« Back to weltagrarbericht.de |
128 | Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) Report
Table 3-3. continued.
Variable |
Current situation |
Source |
Focalized social |
In most countries in LAC—except Cuba—R+D is better informed on the supplychain |
Castro et al., |
Capacity in R+D |
There is a “specialization index” that equals “1” for the case of all researchers |
RICYT, 2007. |
Investment in |
The countries which invest more in terms of average GDP (1990-2004) are Brazil |
RICYT, 2007 |
Performance |
Technologies that because of their relevance are presently considered “leading technologies” for most of countries are those addressing the following changes in agricultural production systems: (a) Increase in agricultural and silvicultural productivities; (b) reduction of agricultural and silvicultural production costs; (c) improvement of product quality in production chains; (d) food security; and (e) improvement process quality in agricultural and silvicultural production chains. These technologies are more suitable for medium and big producers, but less so for agri-business. |
Castro et al., 2005; Lima et al., 2005; Santamaría G. et al., 2005; Ramirez-Gastón R. et al., 2007; Saldaña et al., 2006 |
Relative spaces of public and private R+D |
In Latin America a scenario is emerging such that the private sector is becoming keener to invest in R+D activities, particularly in the improvement of cultivars of crops like corn (and increasingly soybean), which would readily produce profits. In Brazil it is also observed a growing participation of the private sector—the national one mostly—in R+D. |
Castro et al., 2005; Lima et al., 2005; Castro et al., 2006 |
There are evidences that in Argentina the transnational private sector invests in biotechnology about six times the amount invested by the public sector. |
Varela y Bisang, 2006 |
|
Variables for agricultural production systems |
||
Incorporation of knowledge to agriculture |
The countries which invest more in terms of average GDP (1990-2004) are Brazil (0.9%), Cuba, Chile (about 0.6%), Argentina, Mexico, and Panamá (about 0.4%); the rest of the countries invest less than 0.3%, and some below 0.1% (Ecuador, El Salvador, Honduras, Jamaica, Nicaragua and Paraguay). |
RICYT, 2007 |
Resources for agriculture |
Expenses per rural inhabitant (1991-2001). >US$1,000: Uruguay; >US$150 & <US$300: Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, and Chile; >US$75 & <US$150: Panamá, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela; <US$75: Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, Paraguay, Jamaica, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia, and Colombia. |
de Ferranti et al., 2005 |
Agricultural and rural public expenses as percent of agricultural GDP. Average for 1990-2001 was 12.8%. Countries where those expenses were: (a) above the average: Uruguay, Panama, Dominican Republic, Mexico, Nicaragua and Chile; (b) equal to the average: Guatemala and Honduras and (c) below the average: Bolivia, Ecuador, Costa Rica, Jamaica, Peru, Brazil, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Argentina, Paraguay and Colombia. |
Kjöllerström, 2004 |
Previous | Return to table of contents | Search Reports | Next |
« Back to weltagrarbericht.de |