Previous | Return to table of contents | Search Reports | Next |
« Back to weltagrarbericht.de |
Outlook on Agricultural Changes and Its Drivers | 265
four SRES scenarios, the four Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Scenarios, and the four GEO-3 scenarios (West-hoek et al., 2005) also show lower growth projections for the period 2025-2050 compared to 2000-2025. 4.3.2.2 Implications of income growth for agriculture 4.3.2.3. International trade and agriculture Increasing trade patterns in the future. Trade is as an important distinguishing factor for scenarios in several assessments: the MA, GEO and SRES have scenarios with and without trade liberalization. Nevertheless, in terms of actual |
|
trade flows the scenarios all show an increasing trade, even in scenarios without trade liberalization (Bruinsma, 2003; MA, 2005a). An important reason for this increase is that population growth and the development of agricultural production is expected to occur unevenly. The largest increase is expected for total trade in grain and livestock products (see also Table 4-6). Some region specific patterns are expected also, e.g., the OECD region is likely to respond to increasing cereal demands in Asia and MENA. The very rapid yield and area increases projected in sub-Saharan Africa could turn the region from net cereal importer at present to net grain exporter by 2050. Net trade in meat products increases 674%. Net exports will increase in Latin America, by 23000 Gg, while the OECD region and Asia are projected to increase net imports by 15000 and 10000 Gg, respectively (MA, 2005a). Asian demand for primary commodities, such as natural rubber and soybean, is likely to remain strong, boosting the earnings of the exporters of these products. China will become the world's largest importer of agricultural commodities in terms of value by 2020, with imports increasing from US$5 billion in 1997 to US$22 billion in 2020 (UNCTAD, 2005). At a more aggregated scale important trends can be noted (see Rosegrant et al., 2001). The overall trade surplus in agricultural commodities for developing countries may dissappear completely and by 2030 they could, as a group, become net importers of agricultural commodities, especially of temperate zone commodities (FAO, 2003). At the same time, the agricultural trade deficit of the group of least developed countries could quadruple by 2030 primarily due to the fact that industrialized countries tend to be the major beneficiaries of trade arrangements (FAO, 2006b). Many countries have faced much less pressure to reduce support for their agricultural sector primarily due to the fact that commitments to liberalize were based on historically high levels of support and protection. The future of this driver hinges on the outcomes of the Doha Round of trade talks about agricultural support and market access. Export subsi- |
Table 4-5. Per capita income growth projections, per year various assessment results.
Region |
Historic |
MA |
FAO |
OECD |
|||
|
1971-2000 |
1995-2020 |
2020-2050 |
2000-2030 |
2030-2050 |
2010-2020 |
2020-2030 |
Former Soviet Union |
0.4 |
2.24-3.5 |
2.64-4.91 |
4.5 |
4.3 |
3.7 |
3.4 |
Latin America |
1.2 |
1.78-2.8 |
2.29-4.28 |
2.3 |
3.1 |
2.9 |
2.8 |
Middle East/ North Africa |
0.7 |
1.51-1.96 |
1.75-3.42 |
2.4 |
3.1 |
3.6 |
3.9 |
OECD |
2.1 |
2-2.45 |
1.31-1.93 |
2.2 |
2.4 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
Asia |
5 |
3.22-5.06 |
2.43-5.28 |
5 |
4.95 |
4.76 |
4.1 |
Sub-Saharan Africa |
-0.4 |
1.02-1.69 |
2.12-3.97 |
1.6 |
2.8 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
World |
1.4 |
1.39-2.38 |
1.04-3 |
2.1 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
2.5 |
Source: MA, 2005; FAO, 2006b; OECD, 2006a.
Previous | Return to table of contents | Search Reports | Next |
« Back to weltagrarbericht.de |