Table 4-1. Overview of relevant global scenario studies.
|
Main focus |
Character of assessment |
|
GSG |
Sustainable development |
Strong focus on storyline, supported by quantitative accounting system |
|
IPCC-SRES |
Greenhouse gas emissions |
Modelling supported by simple storylines. Multiple models elaborate the same storyline to map out uncertainties. |
|
IPCC-TAR and AR4 |
Climate change, causes and impacts |
Assessment of available literature and some calculations on the basis of IPCC-SRES |
|
UNEP-GEO3/ GEO4 |
Global environmental change |
Storylines and modelling; modelling on the basis of linked models |
|
MA |
Changes in ecosystem services |
Storylines and modelling; modelling on the basis of linked models |
|
FAO-AT2020 |
Changes in agriculture |
Single projection, mostly based on expert judgement. |
|
IFPRI |
Changes in agriculture |
Model-based projections |
|
CA |
Water and agriculture |
Storylines and modelling; modelling on the basis of linked models |
|
Table 4-2. Key assumptions in different scenario "archetypes".
|
Economic optimism |
Reformed Markets |
Global SD |
Regional competition |
Regional SD |
Business as Usual |
Economic development |
very rapid |
rapid |
ranging from slow to rapid |
slow |
ranging from mid to rapid |
medium (globalisation) |
Population growth |
low |
low |
low |
high |
medium |
medium |
Technology development |
rapid |
rapid |
ranging from mid to rapid |
slow |
ranging from slow to rapid |
medium |
Main objectives |
economic growth |
various goals |
global sustainability |
security |
local sustainability |
not defined |
Environmental protection |
reactive |
both reactive and proactive |
proactive |
reactive |
proactive |
both reactive and proactive |
Trade |
globalisation |
globalisation |
globalisation |
trade barriers |
trade barriers |
weak globalisation |
Policies and institutions |
policies create open markets |
policies reduce market failures |
strong global governance |
strong national governments |
local steering; local actors |
mixed |
Note: This table summarises key assumptions in very general terms. Where differences within a set of archetypes exist, broad ranges are indicated.
Table 4-3. Recent scenario-based assessments mapped against scenario “archetypes”.